Quantcast Media Ethics Magazine
Media Ethics online
The Magazine Serving Mass Communications Ethics
Home Analyses/ Commentary News Ethicalia Book Reviews ME Masthead

Search InstructionsSearch by Topic/AuthorSearch by Back Issue

STAFF LOGIN
College Publisher

ME online
is the web version of the print edition of
Media Ethics.  Although some graphics might be omitted, and the calendar may be updated from time to time, the text presented here is the same as that in the print edition. The editor of Media Ethics is John Michael Kittross, but comments on the online edition should be directed to Manny Paraschos.

Media Ethics welcomes any and all contributions. All submitted manuscripts are subject to editing at the discretion of the editor. Because of our editorial policies of independence and inclusion, neither the sponsors nor the editor or publishers shall be held responsible for any views expressed in Media Ethics by authors or others, or for their own follies. Photographs often are digitally altered. Unless otherwise specified, authors and photographers retain all copyrights to their work, subject only to print and electronic publication by Media Ethics itself.

Tell a Different Story: How the News Media Ought to Cover the Pre-primary Presidential Campaign

  • Print
  • Email
Mayer's (1996, 2003a) model demonstrates, with a high degree of predictive success, that nominations are effectively decided before the Iowa caucuses. The model has correctly predicted nine of 11 contested presidential primaries for Republicans and Democrats since 1980. (The anomalies include Gary Hart in 1988 and Howard Dean in 2004.)

This model has two independent variables. First: The candidate must lead in the last Gallup poll before the Iowa caucuses. Second: The candidate must be the most effective fundraiser before the Iowa caucuses.

Mayer draws these conclusions: 1) The current nomination/primary system favors frontrunners; 2) Momentum is an over-rated factor in the process; 3) The frontrunner often stumbles, but these incidents are rarely fatal; 4) The longer we live with this system, the more we learn about it, and this works to the advantage of frontrunners; 5) Money is important, but it is not the whole ball game.

The factors of popularity and fundraising are crucial in the ubiquitous horse race style of political coverage. The news media themselves even pay for much of the polling. Governmentally collected and released fundraising figures offer the press an empirical measure of political legitimacy (at least among contributors). Mayer's model says nothing about how the press covers political campaigns. But my interpretation of his data argues that press coverage in the months prior to the primary election season is critical for a candidate's success even though many Americans do not begin paying close attention to the campaign until after the conventions.

One wonders what information citizens use to make up their minds as reflected in the polls taken during the year preceding the primaries. Is it the kind of information promised in the codes of ethics of professional journalism associations? As journalists themselves complain (Robertson & Papai, 2000), very little press coverage of a political campaign during the pre-election year focuses on the creation, implementation, and critique of policy (Hanson). At this early stage the campaign is a popularity contest based on name recognition and whatever political or personal image already exists in the public mind. Mayer's model demonstrates that the contest ends long before voters hear much about policy.
< prev Page 2 of 6 next >

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 4 of 4

Catherine Dering

posted 3/16/09 @ 4:09 AM EST

A think this new storie have some mistakes.

Mudra Blessington

posted 6/20/09 @ 5:51 PM EST

I thought this debate was about them, as opposed to featuring them. Whoops.

Gent Birch

posted 6/21/09 @ 4:09 AM EST

Great article. I agree totally.

Free Australian Horse Race Tips

posted 2/19/10 @ 12:44 AM EST

Hi There I have gone through your article. Great article. I agree totally.

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Media Ethics is independent. It is editorially eclectic, and the sponsors are not responsible for its content. It strives to provide a forum for opinion and research articles on media ethics, as well as a venue for announcements and reviews of meetings, opportunities, and publications.


ME

sponsors:




Union University

The Kegley Institute of Ethics

Indiana University School of Journalism>

Brigham Young University

The Silha Center for the Study of Media Ethics and Law, University of Minnesota

The Ethics and Excellence in Journalism Foundation

The Institute of Communications Research at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Universidad de Navarra Facultad de Comunicación

Institute of General Semantics

Emerson College