Quantcast Media Ethics Magazine
Media Ethics online
The Magazine Serving Mass Communications Ethics
Home Analyses/ Commentary News Ethicalia Book Reviews ME Masthead Opportunities Contact Us

Search InstructionsSearch by Topic/AuthorSearch by Back Issue

STAFF LOGIN
College Publisher

ME online
is the web version of the print edition of
Media Ethics.  Although some graphics might be omitted, and the calendar may be updated from time to time, the text presented here is the same as that in the print edition. The editor of Media Ethics is John Michael Kittross, but comments on the online edition should be directed to Manny Paraschos.

Media Ethics welcomes any and all contributions. All submitted manuscripts are subject to editing at the discretion of the editor. Because of our editorial policies of independence and inclusion, neither the sponsors nor the editor or publishers shall be held responsible for any views expressed in Media Ethics by authors or others, or for their own follies. Photographs often are digitally altered. Unless otherwise specified, authors and photographers retain all copyrights to their work, subject only to print and electronic publication by Media Ethics itself.

The Ethics of Exposing Sexual Affairs: An Inside Look at the "Flynting" of Politicians

  • Print
  • Email
Media Credit: Javier Garcia-Albea

"The last thing I could ever do is publish something that wasn't true, because it'd kill me. And I know that. So I function at a higher standard than mainstream media." That's what Hustler magazine publisher Larry Flynt told Howard Kurtz, host of CNN's Reliable Sources, in July 2007, just days after Hustler's reportorial handiwork forced Sen. David Vitter (R-LA) to admit he had employed "D. C. madam" Deborah Jeane Palfrey's escort service.

Vitter came clean after Flynt long-time investigator Dan Moldea discovered that the Louisiana lawmaker's name appeared in Palfrey's telephone records, admitting that he had a "very serious sin in [his] past." What made the sordid unveiling even more juicy by Washington's standards-and a coveted prize for Flynt-is that Vitter, when he was a state representative, had pronounced President Bill Clinton "morally unfit to govern" and had based his political career on a socially conservative agenda.

Like much else in Washington, it was a case of history repeating itself. In 1998, Flynt's investigation of congressional dalliances in the shadow of impeachment proceedings against President Bill Clinton ended the career of another Louisiana politician, Bob Livingston, who was about to become House Speaker, a seat only two steps removed from the Presidency in the line of succession. The House Speaker-elect was forced to resign when Flynt revealed that Livingston had engaged in extramarital affairs.

Arguably, this was real news-salacious, certainly, but when politicians run for office on the basis of their sterling character, evidence of moral transgressions is newsworthy and of value to the citizenry.

So what drives a man-who makes his living from magazines and videos that concentrate on the graphic depiction of explicit sex-to expose the sexual escapades of Washington's powerful elite?

On July 13, 2007, just two hours before Flynt taped the interview with Kurtz, he spoke candidly with the authors of this article at a Beverly Hills restaurant, addressing the topic of checkbook journalism and providing insight on his motives for offering $1 million to anyone who "had a sexual encounter with a current member of the United States Congress or a high-ranking government official" or who could document evidence of illicit sexual or intimate relations with a prominent politician.
Page 1 of 4 next >

Article Tools

Be the first to comment on this story

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Media Ethics is independent. It is editorially eclectic, and the sponsors are not responsible for its content. It strives to provide a forum for opinion and research articles on media ethics, as well as a venue for announcements and reviews of meetings, opportunities, and publications.


ME

sponsors:




Union University

The Kegley Institute of Ethics

Indiana University School of Journalism>

Brigham Young University

The Silha Center for the Study of Media Ethics and Law, University of Minnesota

The Ethics and Excellence in Journalism Foundation

The Institute of Communications Research at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Universidad de Navarra Facultad de Comunicación

Institute of General Semantics

Emerson College