Quantcast Media Ethics Magazine
Media Ethics online
The Magazine Serving Mass Communications Ethics
Home Analyses/ Commentary News Ethicalia Book Reviews ME Masthead Opportunities Contact Us

Search InstructionsSearch by Topic/AuthorSearch by Back Issue

STAFF LOGIN
College Publisher

ME online
is the web version of the print edition of
Media Ethics.  Although some graphics might be omitted, and the calendar may be updated from time to time, the text presented here is the same as that in the print edition. The editor of Media Ethics is John Michael Kittross, but comments on the online edition should be directed to Manny Paraschos.

Media Ethics welcomes any and all contributions. All submitted manuscripts are subject to editing at the discretion of the editor. Because of our editorial policies of independence and inclusion, neither the sponsors nor the editor or publishers shall be held responsible for any views expressed in Media Ethics by authors or others, or for their own follies. Photographs often are digitally altered. Unless otherwise specified, authors and photographers retain all copyrights to their work, subject only to print and electronic publication by Media Ethics itself.

Guidelines for Avoiding Conflict of Interest

  • Print
  • Email

"Professional electronic journalists should present the news with integrity and decency, avoiding real or perceived conflicts of interest, and respect the dignity and intelligence of the audience as well as the subjects of news."
~RTNDA Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct


The RTNDA Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct specifically cites the need for avoiding conflicts of interest, whether real or perceived. The act of reporting and presenting the news often puts journalists in the position of working very closely with sources. This is where conflicts of interest can occur. Electronic journalists have an obligation to carry out their jobs-and their private lives- with no real or apparent conflicts of interest.

RTNDA strongly encourages journalists to ask the following questions when covering stories or beats that may produce real or perceived conflicts of interest:

1. Will the private actions of a journalist with a news source or newsmaker give the appearance of an unprofessional connection. Audience members may react with suspicion to revelations of friendships or romances that develop between journalists and their sources-particularly if there is ongoing coverage of a beat or story. Journalists and their managers must realize relationships that would be perfectly acceptable between other adults might not be viewed in the same way when there is also a journalist-source relationship.

2. Will the actions of a journalist's or newsroom manager's family members with a news source or newsmaker give the appearance of an unprofessional connection. In the same way the personal actions of journalists on their private time may come into question, the actions of their spouses and family members may do the same. How will actions of those close to a journalist be perceived by audience members.

3. Is it ever acceptable to accept gifts from a source on a story. If so, is there a monetary value limit on that gift. The FCC's rules call for specific disclosure of payment to air material. But what if the gift comes not in connection with airing specific content. What other motivation might there be for the gift. Consider the appearances created with the audience if the gift were disclosed publicly.

4. Will you accept free admission to parks and events you are covering, even when the general public must pay for the same access. Some ethicists insist journalists covering events requiring a ticket should pay the same fee ticket buyers do, while others insist free access is part of the coverage process. Managers should discuss what sorts of events merit free access and if any do not.
Page 1 of 3 next >

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 2 of 2

cheap custom essays

posted 11/24/09 @ 9:14 PM EST

I completely agree with the author.

seo paslaugos

posted 3/31/10 @ 1:51 AM EST

This is a fantastic article! But, either I?m blind, or you son?t seem to have much information

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Media Ethics is independent. It is editorially eclectic, and the sponsors are not responsible for its content. It strives to provide a forum for opinion and research articles on media ethics, as well as a venue for announcements and reviews of meetings, opportunities, and publications.


ME

sponsors:




Union University

The Kegley Institute of Ethics

Indiana University School of Journalism>

Brigham Young University

The Silha Center for the Study of Media Ethics and Law, University of Minnesota

The Ethics and Excellence in Journalism Foundation

The Institute of Communications Research at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Universidad de Navarra Facultad de Comunicación

Institute of General Semantics

Emerson College